When the case of biology and psychology, economics?

Since it is a good book recommendation, I would like to not only recommend good books, bad books should also be recommended, it be called comprehensive.

Seems popular recently read a book "When the economic event of biology and psychology," full of hopes and expectations of holding open the book a close look, the results disappointed. Do not know the author, but it seems from the look of the book's Introduction is a best-selling author turned to read only after the discovery really is "best-seller!"
Do not know this book are classified in economics books, leisure reading, or entertainment.
If attributable to the former, will definitely give you disappointed. On the economics of systems theory did not receive learning and education, from the book can also see this. Journal of Economic Perspectives book messy messy, fragmented, and I just had gone to MBA, studied macro-economic related courses, but still can not stand, imagine that formal economics graduates to see if This book, then, seems to be spitting blood up.
If attributable to the latter, I believe the general reader is not read, because too much filling the economic terms and the psychological term. Seem to strive to show of their own deep foundation. But from the text, we can barely see on some really good grounding in psychology, in economics is not how you've.
The author did not raise its own distinct point of view, and view many inconsistencies. In particular, a conspicuous one hand, he benefits of a free market economy, on the other hand against the U.S. government antitrust sanctions against Microsoft, claiming deprivation of the benefits for the general public the opportunity. However, there is no thought of as software companies like Microsoft, its fixed mode is first free and then pay to use some software do not pay, do not represent the future of charge. Microsoft used the monopoly of windows, forced bundling IE, outlook, you see no big problem, if all peoples are using Microsoft software, then the consequences will be terrible (not started here, and here 5000 omitted the word ...), which has deprived the public to enjoy a better opportunity for the software.
From this we can see that the so-called West, who advocates a free market economy, have freedom to advocate extreme music, no sense of social responsibility. Some scholars even drift and domestic, not have their own independent thinking, is really ridiculous!
This years popular cross-border music to cross, to cross-border decoration, clothing to mix and match with academic research should cross. Did not say will not let you cross, cross-border success has a lot of people, but at least your foundation and then have a little cross-good or bad? Yes, have re-cross to cross in the past, ah, or cross the bad Bayao flash how to do? Academic research should have a clear point of view is right I remember someone great once said, a book or else put forward their views, or else to refute the previous view. The author, however we have nothing, only to see it he spelled out some of the phenomenon, forcing the economics and psychology and evolutionary biology together. Not been very in-depth reflection and exploration, naturally can not make their own profound ideas and thoughts.
The only people that a good book cover design is, indeed, as the "best-selling book."
In a word, this book does not read worth mentioning!