Finally read this good book, entitled "The Revenge of Marxism - the revival of capitalism and the demise of the Soviet totalitarian socialism." From small to large, education is accepted capitalism and socialism are the two irreconcilable camps, not you die is what I live, those of us who grew up in the flowers of happiness socialism must go to save those who grow up in Britain imperialist oppression of the dire straits of the working class people. In particular, we group of people born in 70s, as a child in the bipolar US-Soviet Cold War era, can not understand the source of Marxism-Leninism, it seems that Marxism is to advocate overthrow of capitalist society and establish a socialist state dictatorship of the proletariat, The Marx and Engels these great names of the characters seems to "overthrow capitalism" synonymous.
However, this book has given us a good perspective to understand what is the real Marxism, Marx really say anything about the relationship between socialism and capitalism is all about. True Marxist Socialism can only just say that the full development of capitalism has been possible under the conditions of the establishment, he merely pointed out a trend that was destroyed Capitalism replaced by socialism. But Marx does not give a timetable, but he did not explain socialism must use power to overthrow capitalism. That the true meaning of Marx is the only full potential of capitalism wiped out, the advantages have become less all the time, capitalism will be replaced by socialism. But at present, although several of capitalism through the Great Depression and recessions, but far from dead end, the opposite, with globalization, capitalism is glowing with youth and vitality.
That three of the socialist road. First, within capitalism, socialism, that is, parliamentary socialism. Socialist party in national politics, but they are the early twentieth century attempts have ended in failure. Second, capitalism, socialism outside, that the Soviet Union and Eastern European countries represented by the socialist countries (including China, of course, a). But is based on immature or that are not fully developed on the basis of capitalism, which inevitably can not escape the ultimate fate of failure. Third, after the full development of capitalism socialism is the view of classical Marxism, unfortunately such a way that has not happened.
The book is not so much let us know what is true Marxist, as that gives us a better understanding of the capitalist; Similarly, I am not so much a Marxist theory of socialism with researchers, as it is a serious serious classical economists and capitalist good student, good researchers and critics. Great amount of information the book, reflecting the author - Meghnad. Desai's strong academic foundation. From Adam Smith to Marx, from Keynes to Schumpeter, Hayek, after reading this book, basically on the development path of developed capitalist countries have a more comprehensive understanding of the process of capitalist development of economic theory The development of schools have a more general understanding.
Perhaps the fact that, as of words, Lenin, Stalin were abused in the name of Marx, without analysis to be used as a Marxist revolutionary theory of its own. Also because of the socialist Soviet Union had successfully created an exception, but it eventually You Yi ended in failure. This led to the so-called "Marx's Revenge" the origin, Who told you do not listen to me, so come back in less than a full-fledged capitalism to establish socialism? But do not know why the author ignores China, the socialist countries are achieved, this particular China no detail. Perhaps the author of the current boom in China has not be determined, still wait and see.
However, there is a comment on the words of China's food for thought indeed very: "China has maintained one-party system of government, maintained a sad human rights record. But it has grown from a poor but egalitarian society towards a less poor but more is not equal society. "
没有评论:
发表评论